← Search

Sandra Ingaldson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Anchorage, AK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 28W–13L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history41 matches
L
2026-10-08 · 7.0 GEP1 Golden Eagle Aces W65F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Lomen
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-01-30 · PHX/Kirkpatrick/65&O/7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Werzynski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-01-16 · 7.0 GEP Golden Eagles W65F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rhonda Kupka
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-01-09 · 7.0 GEP Golden Eagles W65F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Werzynski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-10-24 · 7.0 GEP Golden Eagles W65F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Hall
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
W
2024-10-18 · 7.0 GEP Golden Eagles W65F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Werzynski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-04-11 · PHX/Werzynski/65&O/7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Werzynski
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-03-28 · PHX/Werzynski/65&O/7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Lomen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-0
L
2024-03-07 · PHX/Werzynski/65&O/7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with JUDY WATT
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-7
W
2024-02-22 · PHX/Werzynski/65&O/7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Lomen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2024-02-15 · PHX/Werzynski/65&O/7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with JUDY WATT
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2023-12-07 · 7.0 Golden Eagles W65F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with JUDY WATT
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
70.3%
26W–11L · 57.9% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe