← Search

Catherine Lapointe

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Calgary, AB
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 47W–15L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history62 matches
L
2026-02-23 · 7.0 IOTC QUEENS OF THE COURT W70S · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julia Romanin
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-16 · 7.0 IOTC QUEENS OF THE COURT W70S · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie McCallister
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-01-26 · 7.0 IOTC QUEENS OF THE COURT W70S · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie McCallister
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-11-17 · 7.0 IOTC QUEENS OF THE COURT W70F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane James
loading the estimate
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-10 · 7.0 IOTC QUEENS OF THE COURT W70F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Jorgensen
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-11-03 · 7.0 IOTC QUEENS OF THE COURT W70F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ollie Johnson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-03-20 · PHXWC/Greco/65&O/7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ollie Johnson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-01-30 · PHXWC/Greco/65&O/7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane James
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2024-12-12 · 7.0 IOTC SandBar W65F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane James
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-12-05 · 7.0 IOTC SandBar W65F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane James
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 0-6, 0-1
W
2024-11-21 · 7.0 IOTC SandBar W65F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Jorgensen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-11-14 · 7.0 IOTC SandBar W65F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Jorgensen
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
75.8%
47W–15L · 62.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer