← Search

Wesley Bailey

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hattiesburg, MS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 86W–40L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history126 matches
L
2026-09-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dallas Tanner mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-09-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dallas Tanner mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Makenzie Woodward mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · Hattiesburg 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dallas Tanner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-28 · Hattiesburg 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Mayers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · Hattiesburg 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Regan Rhian Parker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-07 · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-07 · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-06 · #2 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-05 · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-03 · Sumrall 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zachary Christ
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-19 · Sumrall 4.0 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
83.3%
25W–5L · 67.3% of games
3.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 60.5% of games
4.0
52.2%
12W–11L · 50.1% of games
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 62.3% of games
3.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 52.7% of games
6.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 68.7% of games
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 60% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 26% of the time
#1 Singles
26%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
21 matches
#2 Singles
15%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
16 matches
#3 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer