← Search

Makenzie Woodward

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Meridian, MS
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 77W–18L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history95 matches
W
2026-09-15 · Brewer, Elise · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Grace Nicaud Thompson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Default
2026-09-08 · Brewer, Elise · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rhonda Williams
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wesley Bailey mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zachary Christ mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-12 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andria Nanney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-19 · Hattiesburg 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hunter Holcomb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-28 · Hattiesburg 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Noah Rowell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sumner Douglas championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sumner Douglas championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sumner Douglas championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sumner Douglas championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-13 · Ramsey, Nikki · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sumner Douglas
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 71.4% of games
3.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 74.2% of games
3.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 71.4% of games
4.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 63.8% of games
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
76.5%
13W–4L · 62.3% of games
7.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 67% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 65.8% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 54% of games
7.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
22 matches
#1 Singles
16%
15 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer