← Search

Jeff Silverman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
HACKENSACK, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
202 matches · 134W–68L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history202 matches
W
2026-08-09 · NJ: No Shenanigans 40 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Belmonte championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-08 · NJ: No Shenanigans 40 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Markman championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-08 · NJ: No Shenanigans 40 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kenneth Colabella championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-07 · NJ: No Shenanigans 40 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kenneth Colabella championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-07 · NJ: No Shenanigans 40 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Belmonte championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · No Shenanigans · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-01 · No Shenanigans · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kenneth Colabella championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-22 · No Shenanigans · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Park
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · NJ: No Shenanigans 40 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Urvish Barot
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-13 · NJ: No Shenanigans 40 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bobby Choe
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · NJ: No Shenanigans 40 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kenneth Colabella
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-15 · NJ: No Shenanigans 40 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bobby Choe
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
100%
7W–0L · 74.7% of games
4.0
66.5%
117W–59L · 55.8% of games
4.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
32 matches
#1 Singles
9%
18 matches
#2 Singles
8%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer