← Search

Carl DiNatale

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Elma, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 80W–58L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history138 matches
L
2026-10-18 · Eastern/Sage/40&Over4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sanjeev Relan championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-10-17 · Eastern/Sage/40&Over4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Texter championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-10-17 · Eastern/Sage/40&Over4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sanjeev Relan championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-10-16 · Eastern/Sage/40&Over4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Texter championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-10-16 · Eastern/Sage/40&Over4.0M · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sanjeev Relan championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-10-11 · Quaker Aurora · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Witzleben
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-09-27 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Casell championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Casell championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Casell championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-09-25 · Western: Knerr Legends · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Sexton championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-25 · Western: Knerr Legends · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Sexton championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-09-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fredrick Hazzan championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
68.8%
22W–10L · 59.1% of games
4.5
54.2%
13W–11L · 50.4% of games
7.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 64.7% of games
8.0
88.9%
16W–2L · 69.9% of games
9.0
50%
2W–2L · 51.2% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.9% of games
8.0mixed
73.9%
17W–6L · 61.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
43 matches
Singles
17%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
21 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer