← Search

Stefanie Flippin

Cornelius, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
250 matches · 164W–86L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Stefanie Flippin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history250 matches
L
2026-08-31 · LJFI-FINKE/Bailey 7.5 40 + · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Nogowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-15 · LJHU-Huggins/CSD spartan · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Maria Emilia de la Orden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-10 · LJFI-FINKE/Bailey 7.5 40 + · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Megan Hartley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-07-30 · MLSSR-Sree/NMP/Mxd40 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Louis Foreman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-14 · MLSSR-Sree/NMP/Mxd40 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nate Roller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-01 · MLDBA-Baker/NMP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nate Roller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-21 · #1 Doubles · with Maggie Siebert championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · with Michelle Fontana championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-23 · LJFI-FINKE/Bailey 4.0 40+ · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Barton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-04-18 · LKHA-Hallman/CSD · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Hallman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-09 · LJFI-FINKE/Bailey 4.0 40+ · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Barton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-04-02 · LJFI-FINKE/Bailey 4.0 40+ · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patty Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams57 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
72.2%
65W–25L · 57.7% of games
4.5
30.8%
8W–18L · 46% of games
7.5
75.7%
28W–9L · 61% of games
8.5
47.4%
9W–10L · 44.2% of games
4.0mixed
83.3%
15W–3L · 61.4% of games
8.0mixed
40%
8W–12L · 46.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
104 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
57 matches
#1 Singles
2%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer