← Search

Donald Kaefer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fremont, CA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 25W–16L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history41 matches
L
2024-04-11 · MISSION HILLS 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suresh Patel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
W
2024-04-01 · MISSION HILLS 65AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kenneth Neumeister
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-03-04 · MISSION HILLS 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicholas Huerta
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
W
2024-02-13 · MISSION HILLS 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tosh Okano
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2023-10-26 · MISSION HILLS S70M7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Stone
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2023-10-10 · MISSION HILLS S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Cornejo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
L
2023-10-03 · MISSION HILLS S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Cornejo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-7
L
2023-09-05 · MISSION HILLS S70M7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Hotchkiss
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
W
2023-08-29 · MISSION HILLS S70M7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Cornejo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-04-14 · MISSION HILLS 65AM7.0A · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suresh Patel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2023-04-11 · MISSION HILLS 65AM7.0A · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melvin Mischeaux
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 4-6
W
2023-02-21 · MISSION HILLS 65AM7.0A · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suresh Patel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
61%
25W–16L · 56.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
13 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal