← Search

Mardi Robers

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hamilton, MT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 11W–22L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history33 matches
L
2026-08-04 · 6.0 Qualifying Team · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Ford
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-03 · 6.0 Qualifying Team · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Becky Wilcox
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-31 · 6.0 Qualifying Team · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Delis Olsen
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · 6.0 Qualifying Team · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Ford
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-23 · 6.0 Qualifying Team · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Becky Wilcox
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · 6.0 Qualifying Team · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Becky Wilcox
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-03 · 6.0 Qualifying Team · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Delis Olsen
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-03 · 6.0 Qualifying Team · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Delis Olsen
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
L
2025-10-11 · Montana/Crisp/65&Over · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Delis Olsen championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
Barbara Woodward / Pamela Schmidt
2025-10-10 · Montana/Crisp/65&Over · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Delis Olsen championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-10 · Montana/Crisp/65&Over · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Delis Olsen championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-08-09 · 55 6.0 Q Team · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Becky Wilcox
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
50%
3W–3L · 47.7% of games
6.0
29.6%
8W–19L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams