← Search

Denys Hubbard

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tampa, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
221 matches · 127W–94L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history221 matches
L
2026-10-29 · Arbor Greene LOVAS/Gaier · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with AMY ISAAC
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-26 · Arbor Greene/Coffey · #2 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-10-12 · Arbor Greene/Coffey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marcella Guido
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-28 · Arbor Greene/Coffey · #1 Singles · 3.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-21 · Arbor Greene/Coffey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Butts
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-05 · Arbor Greene Summer LOVAs/Gaier · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joan Whitten
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-29 · Arbor Greene Summer LOVAs/Gaier · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rebecca Gaier
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-22 · Arbor Greene Summer LOVAs/Gaier · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lesley Brewis
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · Arbor Greene Summer LOVAs/Gaier · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Silvia Srour
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-05 · Arbor Greene LOVAS Tri/Paul · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Aumond
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-22 · Arbor Greene LOVAS Tri/Paul · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elvie Virgili
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-09 · Arbor Green / D. Hubbard · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jody McNamee
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
61.9%
86W–53L · 54.1% of games
3.5
50%
11W–11L · 47.2% of games
5.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
55.3%
21W–17L · 51.7% of games
7.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 45.4% of games
7.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
70 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
46 matches
#1 Singles
11%
25 matches
#2 Singles
5%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova