← Search

Melissa Gerardi

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tampa, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
185 matches · 107W–78L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history185 matches
W
2026-10-15 · Palma Ceia Dream Team/Jackson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karlene Trosper
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-09-24 · Palma Ceia Dream Team/Jackson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Stichter
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-17 · Palma Ceia Dream Team/Jackson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Stichter
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-09-10 · Palma Ceia Dream Team/Jackson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy MacKechnie
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-22 · HCC/Eicholtz · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa See
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-17 · HCC/Eicholtz · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alisa Davidson
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-08 · HCC/Eicholtz · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa See
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Default
2026-06-05 · Palma Ceia / A. Paglieri · #1 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-21 · Palma Celia/DreamTeam/ L. Jackson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracy MacKechnie
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · Palma Celia/DreamTeam/ L. Jackson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karlene Trosper
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-07 · Palma Ceia / A. Paglieri · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-30 · Palma Ceia / A. Paglieri · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
0-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
70%
7W–3L · 56.2% of games
3.5
63.5%
80W–46L · 53.8% of games
4.0
32.4%
11W–23L · 44.6% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 59.3% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
53 matches
#2 Singles
15%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe