← Search

Lorrie White

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Lutz, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
322 matches · 186W–136L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history322 matches
L
2026-10-19 · Cheval Fall Under the Lights/Crow · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-15 · Cheval Simply Smashing/Missbach · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-10-15 · Cheval Simply Smashing/Missbach · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Chevalier
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-27 · Cheval Vicious Volleys/Carpenter · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Skillman
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-09-22 · Cheval Fall Under the Lights/Crow · #1 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-17 · Cheval Simply Smashing/Missbach · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-09-10 · Cheval Simply Smashing/Missbach · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-17 · Cheval Queens of the Court/McCullough · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tracy Hodapp
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-15 · Cheval Queens of the Court/McCullough · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patricia McCullough
loading the estimate
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · Cheval No Mercy/Crane · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Chevalier
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-31 · Cheval No Mercy/Crane · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Iacono
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-25 · Cheval Queens of the Court/McCullough · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nathalie Crane
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.2% of games
3.0
72.8%
75W–28L · 61.4% of games
3.5
49.7%
72W–73L · 48.3% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
40%
2W–3L · 48% of games
6.5
20%
2W–8L · 40.1% of games
7.0mixed
60%
27W–18L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
114 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
47 matches
#2 Singles
11%
36 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe