← Search

Jennifer Sauld

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ann Arbor, MI
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
188 matches · 131W–57L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history188 matches
W
2026-10-18 · #2 Doubles · with Ty Moss
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-17 · #1 Doubles · with Aubrey Pavlik
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-03 · #1 Doubles · with Emily Dawson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-09-26 · CHIP-Slade 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Mitchell mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-25 · CHIP-Slade 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Mitchell mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-29 · CHIP-Slade 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Mitchell mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-26 · CHIP-Sauld 8.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sean Howard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-12 · CHIP-Sauld 8.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sean Howard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-01 · LIB-Sauld 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne-Marie Kim championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Slade championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-10 · CHIP-Slade 18s 8.0X F · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Todd Schalk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · LIB-Sauld 18s 4.0 NW F2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Slade
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams80 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
60%
3W–2L · 64.8% of games
4.0
73.2%
52W–19L · 60.5% of games
4.5
52.2%
12W–11L · 53.2% of games
7.5
87.5%
14W–2L · 63.2% of games
8.5
40%
2W–3L · 48.9% of games
9.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 78.7% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
65%
26W–14L · 55.6% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
43 matches
Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe