← Search

Constance Moyer

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
EASTON, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 35W–19L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history54 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Match Makers · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ingrid Unternahrer
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-22 · Match Makers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Hulsizer
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-11-02 · Match Makers · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Benn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-06-03 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Benn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Hulsizer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-05-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Anthony
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 5-2
W
2024-12-07 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sheila Tice
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-1
W
2024-11-17 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debbie Morgan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-5
L
2024-11-03 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cheryl Peechatka-Hoffman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ingrid Unternahrer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ingrid Unternahrer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
L
2024-01-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ingrid Unternahrer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
60%
6W–4L · 54.3% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
75.7%
28W–9L · 61% of games
7.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 35% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert