← Search

Cynthia Balchunas

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Reading, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 14W–33L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history47 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Hillcrest · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Siebert
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-17 · Hillcrest · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Siebert
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-03 · Hillcrest · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joan Crossan
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-27 · Hillcrest · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Siebert
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2025-12-07 · Hillcrest · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Soosyn Fuster-Marin
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-11-23 · Hillcrest · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Siebert
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-09 · Hillcrest · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Leslie Siebert
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-11-02 · Hillcrest · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annette Vail
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-18 · Hillcrest · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annette Vail
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-10-12 · Hillcrest · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Fletcher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-05 · Hillcrest · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Fletcher
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-01-05 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Annette Vail
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
33.3%
8W–16L · 40.1% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0
30%
6W–14L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
17 matches
#2 Singles
13%
6 matches
#1 Singles
9%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal