← Search

Martha Rhodes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
RICHMOND, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
263 matches · 130W–133L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history263 matches
L
2026-10-18 · Bon Air 6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jerry Ray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-11 · Bon Air 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jerry Ray mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-09 · Bon Air Metz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Lawson
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-02 · BACA Lowe Key Ladies · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shanan Raines
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-09-02 · Bon Air Metz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Woodroof
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-26 · BACA Lowe Key Ladies · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Balsamo
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-19 · Bon Air Metz · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Lawson
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-13 · Bon Air Rhodes · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelli Ball
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-11 · Bon Air Foster's Finest · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Balsamo
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-06 · Bon Air Rhodes · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelli Ball
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-27 · Bon Air Foster's Finest · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Lawson
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-22 · Bon Air Rhodes · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angie Pearson
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
50%
3W–3L · 51.4% of games
3.0
50.5%
49W–48L · 50.2% of games
3.5
18.4%
7W–31L · 38.1% of games
5.5
78.6%
11W–3L · 59% of games
6.0
50%
5W–5L · 59% of games
6.5
58.6%
17W–12L · 52.4% of games
7.0
33.3%
6W–12L · 45.2% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
72.2%
26W–10L · 59.2% of games
7.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 44.2% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
106 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
59 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert