← Search

Karen Fleissner

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Tempe, AZ
3.5S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
35 matches · 18W–17L · seasons 2018–2022
Match history35 matches
W
2022-04-08 · 7.0 PTC WalkerSmarr X18S · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Hankins mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2022-03-25 · 7.0 PTC WalkerSmarr X18S · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Hankins mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2022-02-18 · 7.0 PTC WalkerSmarr X18S · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Hankins mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2022-01-21 · 7.0 PTC WalkerSmarr X18S · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Hankins mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2021-12-03 · 7.0 PTC Howell Open X18F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Hankins mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2021-11-12 · 7.0 PTC Howell Open X18F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Hankins mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2021-10-22 · 7.0 PTC Howell Open X18F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Hankins mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
L
2021-09-24 · 7.0 PTC Howell Open X18F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vineet Awasthi mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
W
2021-03-26 · 7.0 Kiw McKinney X18S · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Kosnik mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
L
2021-02-26 · 7.0 Kiw McKinney X18S · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Kosnik mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2021-02-06 · 7.0 Kiw McKinney X18S · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sjaak van der Geest mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
W
2021-01-15 · 7.0 Kiw McKinney X18S · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sjaak van der Geest mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2022
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
58.3%
7W–5L · 52.9% of games
7.0mixed
47.8%
11W–12L · 45.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#2 Singles
14%
5 matches
#1 Singles
9%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe