Catherine Zack
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pittsburgh, PA
33 matches · 16W–17L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history33 matches
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
50%
15W–15L · 50.9% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Pressure is a privilege.