Search

Deborah Kane

Pittsburgh, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 31W–33L · seasons 20192026

Captains: add Deborah Kane to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-08-08 · FC Advantage · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gwen Zaleski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-07-25 · FC Advantage · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Hamlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-21 · Breakers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betsy Segall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-14 · Breakers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anna Konrad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-11 · FC Advantage · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melia Kaneta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Breakers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Betsy Segall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-16 · Breakers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-14 · FC Advantage · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Fratangelo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
Shannon Jones / Sara Hassan
2026-05-17 · FC Advantage · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melia Kaneta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-12 · Breakers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynne Reder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2025-08-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 56.4% of games
3.5
43.8%
14W–18L · 43.9% of games
7.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova