← Search

Betsy Wood-Ehrenberger

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
214 matches · 126W–88L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history214 matches
L
2026-10-01 · ACrumpler-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julia Perkins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-22 · Al.Crumpler18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julia Perkins
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-09-01 · Al.Crumpler18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anna Kouba
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · ACrumpler-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with LeAnne Bloedon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-11 · Mo.Hodl40A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leah Ragsdale
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-30 · Le.Ragsdale18A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Vander Vennet
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-29 · Le.Ragsdale18A · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-24 · 1 ACrumpler-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Vander Vennet
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-23 · Le.Ragsdale18A · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathryn Gerber
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-04-17 · 1 ACrumpler-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Matthews
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-03 · Is.Gesher55A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Jones
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-02 · Mo.Hodl40A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carrie Vander Vennet
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
52.9%
9W–8L · 50.3% of games
3.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 63.6% of games
3.5
60%
24W–16L · 55% of games
4.0
49.2%
30W–31L · 52.3% of games
6.5
75%
12W–4L · 60.6% of games
7.5
61.7%
37W–23L · 55.2% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
61 matches
#2 Singles
7%
14 matches
#1 Singles
5%
11 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert