← Search

Lisa Endsley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pasadena, CA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 7W–18L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history25 matches
L
2026-09-27 · LA - Downtown Aces 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Johanna Baumann
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-12 · LA - Downtown Aces 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gillian Smith
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-14 · LA - Downtown Aces 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fariba Navid
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-4
L
2026-05-31 · LA - Downtown Aces 3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-4
L
2026-04-18 · LA - Downtown Aces 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tamar Stevens
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-14 · LA - Downtown Aces 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stefanie Hall
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-02-15 · LA - Downtown Aces 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diep Ho
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-1, 1-0
L
2026-01-24 · LA - Downtown Aces 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claire Gibbs
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-07-21 · SGV Rebelettes-McNulty-Dawson Park/SA12:30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kam Jara
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-06-15 · SGV Rebelettes-McNulty-Dawson Park/SA12:30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Irma Martinez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-19 · SGV Rebelettes-McNulty-Dawson Park/SA12:30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joyce Zhu
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2019-10-26 · SGV Don’t Push it-AL.SS/Su4 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Spangler
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 43.8% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
7 matches
#1 Singles
24%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
3 matches
#2 Singles
12%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer