← Search

Ricardo Green

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Columbia, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
386 matches · 222W–164L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history386 matches
L
2026-11-01 · Vissering - Groundies & Lobs comboXD · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julia Potter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-23 · FredCha8.5MX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Margie Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · FredCha8.5MX · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Margie Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-16 · Vissering - Groundies & Lobs comboXD · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Margie Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-06 · Vissering - Groundies & Lobs comboXD · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Margie Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-12 · Zehr - Gotta Serve Somebody · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Zehr
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-20 · Zehr - Gotta Serve Somebody · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Paul Brennan
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · Zehr - Gotta Serve Somebody · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Suresh Ram
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-28 · Lee · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Renaldo Savady
loading the estimate
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-19 · Lee · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Renaldo Savady
loading the estimate
7-6, 0-4
W
2026-04-26 · Zehr - Gotta Serve Somebody · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alexandre Fines
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · Lee · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frederic Colas
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams95 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level15 levels played
0.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 48.9% of games
3.5
69.6%
64W–28L · 60.8% of games
4.0
53.1%
51W–45L · 51.6% of games
7.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.2% of games
8.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 41.5% of games
8.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.7% of games
2.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 57.9% of games
3.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 64% of games
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
67.4%
31W–15L · 57.8% of games
7.5mixed
75%
12W–4L · 64.8% of games
8.0mixed
47.2%
25W–28L · 49.8% of games
8.5mixed
32.1%
9W–19L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
151 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
116 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
111 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer