← Search

Margie Davis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Columbia, MD
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
545 matches · 390W–155L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history545 matches
W
2026-10-28 · Pietryka - PieCombo 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Quynh Tran
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-10-17 · #1 Singles · 4.5 championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-16 · #1 Singles · 4.5 championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-10-07 · Vissering - Groundies & Lobs · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Wendy Guo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-23 · FredCha8.5MX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ricardo Green mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-09-19 · Vissering - Groundies & Lobs · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jessica Lee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-19 · #1 Singles · 4.5 championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-16 · Vissering - Groundies & Lobs · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jessica Lee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-2
W
2026-09-11 · Vissering - Groundies & Lobs · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ruzica Ragontse
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-09-08 · mccullough - Tri- Bounce-tastic · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kasey Kinney
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-26 · FredCha8.5MX · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ricardo Green mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-16 · Vissering - Groundies & Lobs comboXD · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ricardo Green mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams129 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
3.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 68.7% of games
3.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 40.6% of games
4.0
100%
22W–0L · 85.2% of games
4.5
71.3%
169W–68L · 59.6% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
79.5%
62W–16L · 62.6% of games
3.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 57.1% of games
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.1% of games
7.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 70.9% of games
8.0mixed
70.3%
26W–11L · 55.6% of games
8.5mixed
45.7%
16W–19L · 50% of games
9.0mixed
57.6%
34W–25L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
208 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
114 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
83 matches
#1 Singles
10%
56 matches
#2 Singles
8%
41 matches
Singles
7%
38 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer