← Search

Anne Jagodits

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Poolesville, MD
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
529 matches · 272W–257L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history529 matches
L
2026-10-28 · LewisCombo8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimberly Wells
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-12 · FredCha8.5MX · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bruce Matthews mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-26 · FredCha8.5MX · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Xavier Cha mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-23 · Lewis - 4.5Fred Groundies & Lobs · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dao Phan-Vissering championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-02 · Biesecker - Rally Gals 55+8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Seyler
loading the estimate
6-0, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · Bullman - Bulltek · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ira Daar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · Biesecker - Rally Gals 55+8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Seyler
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-25 · Biesecker - Rally Gals 55+8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephanie Cabaniss
loading the estimate
1-1
W
2026-07-25 · Bullman - Bulltek · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ira Daar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-24 · Thompson- TenACEious Team · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Catalina Tafur
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-23 · Lim 4.5 Women · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lora Bacanskas
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-20 · Biesecker - Rally Gals 55+8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Seyler
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams146 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
0.0
25%
4W–12L · 40.6% of games
3.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 57% of games
4.5
46.5%
92W–106L · 50.8% of games
8.0
80%
40W–10L · 65% of games
8.5
55.2%
37W–30L · 52.6% of games
9.0
37%
10W–17L · 45.7% of games
9.5
33.3%
6W–12L · 44.1% of games
0.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.5% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
26W–13L · 55.6% of games
8.5mixed
66.7%
16W–8L · 55.8% of games
9.0mixed
38.2%
26W–42L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
201 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
135 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
103 matches
#1 Singles
13%
71 matches
#2 Singles
3%
18 matches
#2 Female Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams