← Search

Joan Garlow

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Baltimore, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
291 matches · 158W–133L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history291 matches
W
2026-10-07 · Ioannou 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Danielle Barry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-09-26 · Ioannou 8.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Danielle Barry
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-09-18 · Baker 40+4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Virginia Fung championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-18 · Baker 40+4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Virginia Fung championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-29 · Baker 55+8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laurie Freese championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-28 · Baker 55+8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Yospa championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-12 · Ioannou 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julia Potter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-05 · Ioannou 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julia Potter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-02 · Baker 55+8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Yospa
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · Baker 55+8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Yospa
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · Baker 40+4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Yospa
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · Baker 55+8.0 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laurie Freese
loading the estimate
1-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams73 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.5% of games
4.0
57.6%
106W–78L · 53.1% of games
4.5
18.8%
3W–13L · 41.1% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 49% of games
8.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 50.2% of games
0.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
54.2%
26W–22L · 53.2% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
116 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
111 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
58 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer