← Search

Jessica Walsh

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Essex, MD
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
225 matches · 141W–84L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2021. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history225 matches
L
2026-10-14 · Mannion’s Match Makers · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Erin Deneen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-10-07 · Mannion’s Match Makers · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gina Mannion
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-10 · Bryson - Natalie's Net Ninjas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurie Freese
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-03 · Bryson - Natalie's Net Ninjas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karla Cachiaras
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-09-01 · Trochimowicz 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tammi Molavi
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-24 · Bryson - Natalie's Net Ninjas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Barwick
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-18 · Bryson - Natalie's Net Ninjas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Robertson
loading the estimate
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-08-04 · Bryson - Natalie's Net Ninjas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ruzica Ragontse
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-4
W
2026-08-03 · Bryson - Natalie's Net Ninjas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Barwick
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · LaMoure 40+4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shalita Williams
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · Bryson - Natalie's Net Ninjas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Barwick
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-20 · Bryson - Natalie's Net Ninjas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Robertson
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams60 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 59.1% of games
3.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 64.6% of games
4.0
61.2%
52W–33L · 54.8% of games
4.5
25.9%
7W–20L · 39.5% of games
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 67% of games
8.5
75%
3W–1L · 62.9% of games
4.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
83.9%
26W–5L · 61.4% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 42.9% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
22W–11L · 54.1% of games
8.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.7% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 34.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
112 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
42 matches
#1 Singles
3%
7 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams