← Search

Danielle Barry

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bel Air, MD
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
325 matches · 190W–135L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history325 matches
L
2026-10-25 · Three’s a Rally · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Perkins
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-16 · Wisehaven - Michels · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sheryl Stoll
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-10-11 · Three’s a Rally · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chrissy Schuck
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-5
W
2026-10-07 · Ioannou 8.5 · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Joan Garlow
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-10-03 · Wisehaven - Michels · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laura Lanza
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-26 · Ioannou 8.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Joan Garlow
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-09-13 · Barry - Danielle's Baseline Warriors · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maureen Kolb
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-09-12 · Ioannou 8.5 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Quynh Tran
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-12 · Wisehaven - Michels · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heather Myers
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-03 · Barry - Danielle's Baseline Warriors · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kamdyn Balko
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-3
L
2026-08-30 · Three’s a Rally · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Perkins
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-25 · Barry - Danielle's Baseline Warriors · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Maureen Kolb
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 59.9% of games
3.0
59.5%
22W–15L · 52.2% of games
3.5
87.5%
21W–3L · 68% of games
4.0
67.3%
105W–51L · 56.5% of games
4.5
28%
14W–36L · 42.4% of games
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 51.9% of games
7.5
50%
7W–7L · 53.4% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 50.5% of games
8.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 48.4% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
112 matches
#1 Singles
26%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
28 matches
#2 Singles
5%
16 matches
Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer