← Search

David Sugar

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
West Falmouth, MA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 10W–31L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history41 matches
L
2026-10-31 · FSC:Sugar:Gwynn · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Cappellini
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-23 · FSC:Gwynn:Sugar · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Gwynn
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-18 · FSC:Gwynn:Sugar · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anthony Sirianni
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-30 · FSC:Gwynn:Sugar · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Gwynn
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-16 · FSC:Gwynn:Sugar · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Russ Ottey
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-09 · FSC:Gwynn:Sugar · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Scotten
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-13 · FSC:Sugar:Gwynn · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Deignan
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-01 · FSC:Gwynn:Sugar · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Russ Ottey
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-31 · FSC:Gwynn:Sugar · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Gwynn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-04-26 · FSC:Gwynn:Sugar · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Gwynn
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2024-11-23 · FAL:Sugar/Sugar/Gwynn · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Wright
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-6
W
2024-03-09 · FSC:Sugar:Sugar · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Arthur Gutch
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
0%
0W–7L · 33.6% of games
8.0
29.4%
10W–24L · 40.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 56% of the time
#3 Doubles
56%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
4 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams