← Search

Albert Barrows

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Yarmouth Port, MA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
65 matches · 45W–20L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history65 matches
W
2026-10-24 · MCAC:Veninger · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Abdel Elmemeh
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-09-26 · MCAC:Pernick:Majewski · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wendell Anderson championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-16 · MCAC:Pernick:Majewski · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Hagenstein
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-16 · MCAC:Pernick:Majewski · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mario Mariani
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · MCAC:Pernick:Majewski · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Majewski
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-17 · MCAC:Veninger · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Weinman
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
2025-12-13 · MCAC:Veninger · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Schmidt
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-09-13 · MCAC:Veninger:Veninger · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Hamilton championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-13 · MCAC:Pernick:Majewski · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Hagenstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-06-14 · MCAC:Pernick:Majewski · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wendell Anderson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-05-31 · MCAC:Pernick:Majewski · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Hagenstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-05-10 · MCAC:Pernick:Majewski · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Weinman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
69.5%
41W–18L · 57% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
15 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer