← Search

Diane Greenwood

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
LA Jolla, CA
3.5S year-end 2024
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
29 matches · 10W–19L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history29 matches
L
2026-08-14 · SD HT SDTRC/ Losito · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica Meyer
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-17 · SD HT SDTRC/ Losito · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorena Monzon
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-22 · SD 3.5 SDTRC (2:2)/ Kleiner · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Peinado
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-27 · SD 3.5 SDT&RC(X:X)/ Adams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Stevens
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-01-23 · SD 3.5 SDT&RC(X:X)/ Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheryl Putnam
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-08-12 · SD 7.0 SDTRC/ Pillow · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William White mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
W
2023-07-15 · SD 7.0 SDTRC/ Pillow · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with William White mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2023-07-01 · SD 7.0 SDTRC/ Pillow · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with William White mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
W
2022-03-19 · SD 7.0 SDT&R/ Channick · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with William White mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
L
2022-03-13 · SD 7.0 SDT&R/ Channick · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with William White mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2022-02-26 · SD 7.0 SDT&R/ Channick · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with William White mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 5-7
W
2022-02-12 · SD 7.0 SDT&R/ Channick · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with William White mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
31.2%
5W–11L · 36.6% of games
7.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 46.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova