← Search

David Saxe

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Venice, FL
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
14 matches · 8W–6L · seasons 2021–2024
Match history14 matches
L
2024-09-15 · KRC 8.5 Men · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Peter Brewer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2024-08-11 · KRC 8.5 Men · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Charles Jansing
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2024-03-08 · Laurel Oak Rosenberg · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dave Barcomb
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-02-22 · Laurel Oak Rosenberg · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bradley Sutter
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2024-02-15 · Laurel Oak Rosenberg · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dave Barcomb
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-02-08 · Laurel Oak Rosenberg · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Capazola
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-02-01 · Laurel Oak Rosenberg · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Capazola
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2023-05-03 · Plantation Bailey · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Allyson Houston mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2023-04-16 · Plantation Bailey · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lee Bailey mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2020-03-01 · Englewood/Christis · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Georges Courteau
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2020-02-29 · Englewood/Christis · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter McKinnon
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2020-02-15 · Englewood/Christis · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gary McBride
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2020–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
8.0
70%
7W–3L · 56.6% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe