← Search

Donald Huber

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Omaha, NE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 4W–16L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history20 matches
L
Roderick Harley / Peter Eppens
2026-05-16 · Banks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kyle Anderson
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-02 · Banks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Glenn Thomson
loading the estimate
6-7, 0-6
L
2025-07-12 · Banks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom Calvert
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-07 · Banks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Higgins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-01 · Banks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom Calvert
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-30 · Banks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom Calvert
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
W
Roderick Harley / Patrick Legler
2025-06-28 · Banks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tom Calvert
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-06-07 · Banks · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ryan Wills
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-31 · Banks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Higgins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-07-06 · Banks · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Higgins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-22 · Banks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dale Banks
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2024-06-01 · Banks · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Higgins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
20%
4W–16L · 34.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams