← Search

Tom Hageman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Omaha, NE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 15W–10L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history25 matches
W
2026-06-20 · Wester · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with CHRIS PERRONE
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
Roderick Harley / Peter Eppens
2026-06-06 · Wester · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Hendricks
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-09 · Wester · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Hunsinger
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-02 · Wester · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hani Haider
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-0
L
2025-07-19 · Wester · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Shaw
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-7
W
2025-07-07 · Wester · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with CHRIS PERRONE
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-06-30 · Wester · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Hani Haider
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-06-28 · Wester · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Dorsett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-07 · Wester · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Hunsinger
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2024-07-06 · NE/Penland/55&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Bluml
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2024-06-08 · NE/Penland/55&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roger Penland
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2024-05-11 · NE/Penland/55&Over7.0M · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ronn Winquest
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
50%
2W–2L · 58.2% of games
7.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 57.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually Singles, 32% of the time
Singles
32%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
12%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams