← Search

Kelly Pryzwansky

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greensboro, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
342 matches · 179W–163L · seasons 2017–2026
Match history342 matches
W
2026-04-06 · Clift/Cope 18s 3.5W Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirsten Braxton
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-11-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mariann Van Ryen championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-09 · Terrell/Billings 40s 6.5 Combo W Thursday AM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ginger Ballard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-10-09 · East/Pitts 18s 7.5 Combo W Thurs PM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marian Hogan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-08 · Sheppard/Hjelt 18s 6.5 Combo W Wed PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ginger Ballard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-10-04 · #3 Singles · 3.5 championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
W
2025-09-29 · Warrick 40s 7.5 Combo W Mon AM · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andrea Shafer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-09-28 · Warrick 40s 7.5 Combo W Mon AM · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dabney Porter
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty Craig championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patty Craig championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-09-09 · Kirby 55s 6.5 Combo W Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Hanson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2025-09-02 · Kirby 55s 6.5 Combo W Tues PM · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Hanson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams155 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 51.4% of games
3.0
75.5%
37W–12L · 61.8% of games
3.5
39.5%
34W–52L · 48% of games
4.0
10.5%
2W–17L · 33% of games
5.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 54.6% of games
6.5
56.9%
29W–22L · 54.3% of games
7.5
28.6%
6W–15L · 40.7% of games
3.5mixed
65.5%
19W–10L · 55.4% of games
4.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 70% of games
7.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 49% of the time
#3 Doubles
49%
166 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
87 matches
Singles
12%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
25 matches
#3 Singles
5%
16 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer