← Search

Emie Barnes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naples, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 14W–29L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history43 matches
L
2025-02-10 · Pelican Bay South / Handy · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maureen Parkinson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-01-27 · Pelican Bay South / Handy · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Donovan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
L
2025-01-20 · Pelican Bay South / Handy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandy Burton
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-01-06 · Pelican Bay South / Handy · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paula Donovan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2024-05-13 · Pelican Bay South - Reed · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michelle Thomas
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-05-06 · Pelican Bay South - Reed · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rosemary Marinone
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-04-22 · Pelican Bay South - Reed · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Groark
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2024-04-15 · Pelican Bay South - Reed · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paula Stoecklein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2023-11-27 · COLLIER /Howard/65&Over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Kalmanson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2023-11-20 · COLLIER /Howard/65&Over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rosemary Marinone
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-10-30 · COLLIER /Howard/65&Over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tara Porte
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
W
2023-10-23 · COLLIER /Howard/65&Over7.0W · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Kalmanson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 57.7% of games
6.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.6% of games
7.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 41.3% of games
7.5
30.4%
7W–16L · 42.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 51% of the time
#3 Doubles
51%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams