← Search

Seth Katz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
GAINESVILLE, GA
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
47 matches · 24W–23L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history47 matches
L
2025-11-20 · CCC-Katz · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie White mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-11-13 · CCC-Katz · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Reed mixed
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-30 · CCC-Katz · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rena Millwood mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-10-16 · CCC-Katz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Kimbrell mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-09 · CCC-Katz · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie White mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-29 · Alberta Banks-Nieves · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Rabinowitz mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-05-01 · Alberta Banks-Nieves · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Rabinowitz mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-04-24 · Alberta Banks-Nieves · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Ross mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 5-7
L
2024-11-21 · CCC-Jackson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey McCamy mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
W
2024-11-18 · CCC-Jackson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey McCamy mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-10-24 · CCC-Jackson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Loggins mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
L
2024-10-10 · CCC-Jackson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Hoosh mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
57.9%
11W–8L · 54.5% of games
4.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.5% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 53.9% of games
4.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.6% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova