← Search

Christine Gilmore

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Louisville, KY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 74W–50L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history124 matches
W
2026-11-01 · KY/LOU/MCCLELLAN/MAGUIRE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Scanlan
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-18 · KY/LOU/MCCLELLAN/MAGUIRE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Johnson
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · KY/LOU/WEBBER/ GOODWIN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Beth Zarobsky championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-07-25 · KY/LOU/WEBBER/ GOODWIN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Beth Zarobsky championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-25 · KY/LOU/WEBBER/ GOODWIN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Beth Zarobsky championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-24 · KY/LOU/WEBBER/ GOODWIN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Beth Zarobsky championship
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-24 · KY/LOU/WEBBER/ GOODWIN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Beth Zarobsky championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-21 · KY/LOU/WEBBER/ GOODWIN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Beth Zarobsky championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-21 · KY/LOU/WEBBER/ GOODWIN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Beth Zarobsky championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 4-1
W
2026-06-20 · KY/LOU/WEBBER/ GOODWIN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Beth Zarobsky championship
loading the estimate
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · KY/LOU/WEBBER/ GOODWIN · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Beth Zarobsky championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-19 · KY/LOU/WEBBER/ GOODWIN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Beth Zarobsky championship
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
66%
62W–32L · 56.6% of games
4.5
26.7%
4W–11L · 42.5% of games
7.5
50%
3W–3L · 58.1% of games
8.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 57% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
34 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal