Search

Brandy Horwitz

HAILEY, ID
4.5C year-end 2024
78 matches · 58W–20L · seasons 20192024
Where Brandy sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Brandy is one of 423 women at 4.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.5 account for 98% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Brandy has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.54.04.52019202020232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Brandy has gone from the 98th to the 99th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2020.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
4.0
84%
21W–4L · 68.6% of games
4.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 55.3% of games
8.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 57.5% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history78 matches
L
Jane McQuade / Cathy Davischamps
2024-08-17 · #1 Doubles · with Hanna Bigelow
0.033below expectation — took 32% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Mila Wood / Shelley Warechamps
2024-08-17 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer Schwartz
0.035below expectation — took 28% of games against 47% expected
6-0, 7-5
W
Leslie Barrowes / Linda Meriglianochamps
2024-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Jennifer Schwartz
+0.020better than expected — took 80% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Kathy Brashear / Debbie Wachtellchamps
2024-08-03 · #3 Doubles · with Barbara Figge
0.002about as expected — took 35% of games against 39% expected
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
Mila Wood / Gina Sharpchamps
2024-08-02 · #1 Doubles · with Heather Linhart
0.043below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Dana Gross / Dana Rosellini
2024-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Heather Linhart
+0.011better than expected — took 56% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
Becky Caven / Vicki McBride
2024-07-27 · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hanna Bigelow
+0.020better than expected — took 60% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Vicki McBride / Robyn Roby
2024-07-27 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Schwartz
+0.022better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Melanie Smith / Michelle Barrow
2024-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kristin Miller
+0.039better than expected — took 71% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Heidi Mickelson / Melanie Smith
2024-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Heather Linhart
+0.042better than expected — took 75% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2023-09-17 · #1 Doubles · with Heather Linhart
+0.021better than expected — took 86% of games against 67% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Kim Phillips / Lynn Arensonchamps
2023-09-16 · #3 Doubles · with Heidi Mickelson
0.058below expectation — took 35% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.