← Search

Alejandro Mejia

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Dimas, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 43W–35L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history78 matches
W
2026-06-21 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SA8 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Oscar Alberto Bonilla
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-05-31 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SA8 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Luzzi
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-17 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SA8 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Shin
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-10 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SA8 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Oscar Alberto Bonilla
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-09-28 · SGV Mixed Underdogs-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sandy Weyant mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
L
2025-09-21 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Placido MacAraeg
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-09-13 · SGV Underdogs-Ponnaganti-Dimond Bar HS/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ted Shen
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-08-31 · SGV Underdogs-Ponnaganti-Dimond Bar HS/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ted Shen
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-07-20 · SGV Underdogs-Ponnaganti-Dimond Bar HS/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Gerald Alphonse
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-29 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joseph Luzzi
loading the estimate
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-22 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Shin
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-07 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Luzzi-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ted Shen
loading the estimate
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
92.3%
12W–1L · 66.8% of games
3.5
52.8%
19W–17L · 48.9% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
25%
2W–6L · 44.2% of games
5.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 50.5% of games
7.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
12 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert