← Search

Annemarie Schnedler

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pasadena, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 61W–48L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history109 matches
L
2026-11-03 · SGV Team Arroyo Seco-Yu-Arroyo Seco/T12:30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Florence Chen
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-11-01 · SGV Ball Hogs-R. Yip-Arroyo Seco/SU12 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jordan Curiel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-25 · SGV Ball Hogs-Yip-Arroyo Seco/ SU2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristelle Yale
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-10-13 · SGV Team Arroyo Seco-Yu-Arroyo Seco/T12:30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristelle Yale
loading the estimate
0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-11 · SGV Ball Hogs-Yip-Arroyo Seco/ SU2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Peng
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-10-04 · SGV Queens of the Court- Vuong-Arroyo Seco/SA4 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janna Conner-Niclaes
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-10-03 · SGV Ball Hogs-R. Yip-Arroyo Seco/SU12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andy Tromans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-27 · SGV Ball Hogs-Yip-Arroyo Seco/ SU2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with April Mutuc
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-09-25 · SGV Team Arroyo Seco-Yu-Arroyo Seco/T12:30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristelle Yale
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-20 · SGV Triple Match Point-Spangler-Arroyo Seco/SU12 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Makiko Sato
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-20 · SGV Queens of the Court- Vuong-Arroyo Seco/SA4 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janna Conner-Niclaes
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-15 · SGV Team Arroyo Seco-Yu-Arroyo Seco/T12:30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristelle Yale
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.3% of games
3.0
79.2%
19W–5L · 60.4% of games
3.5
53.8%
21W–18L · 51.3% of games
4.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 46.1% of games
2.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 60.5% of games
3.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 36.2% of games
5.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 42.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
31 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert