← Search

Rebecca Stokes

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Altadena, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 63W–42L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history105 matches
W
2026-09-20 · SGV Creme de la Court-Kim-Flint CYN/SU2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanne Kim
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · SGV Early Bird Specials-Mazin-Flint Cyn/SA12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kasia Chmielewski
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · SGV Creme de la Court-Kim-Flint CYN/SU2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Mazin
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-27 · SGV Early Bird Specials-Mazin-Flint Cyn/SA12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristin McQueen
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-20 · SGV Early Bird Specials-Mazin-Flint Cyn/SA12 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mindy Schiffman
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
W
Default
2026-06-07 · SGV Creme de la Court-Kim-Flint CYN/SU2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin McQueen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-17 · SGV Creme de la Court-Kim-Flint CYN/SU2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Newsome Moltz
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-15 · SGV Creme de la Court- Kim-Flint Cyn/SU2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin McQueen
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-08 · SGV Creme de la Court- Kim-Flint Cyn/SU2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Lieberenz
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-11-22 · SGV FC Hit Squad-Abadzheva-Flint Canyon/SU2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Irina Abadzheva
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-11-01 · SGV FC Hit Squad-Abadzheva-Flint Canyon/SU2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Mazin
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-10-18 · SGV FC Hit Squad-Abadzheva-Flint Canyon/SU2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Irina Abadzheva
loading the estimate
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
83.3%
25W–5L · 65.2% of games
4.0
47.5%
29W–32L · 49.6% of games
8.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.5% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 73.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 37% of the time
#1 Singles
37%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
9 matches
#2 Singles
7%
7 matches
#3 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams