← Search

Kasia Chmielewski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pasadena, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 65W–60L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history125 matches
L
2026-10-31 · SGV Live Oaks Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SA1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christyne Burdett
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-24 · SGV Tennis Addicts-James Lee-Arroyo HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arthur Chmielewski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-10-18 · SGV Tennis Addicts-James Lee-Arroyo HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arthur Chmielewski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-09-20 · SGV Live Oaks Ladies-Perry-Live Oaks/SA1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Tong
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-09-12 · SGV Tennis Addicts-James Lee-Arroyo HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Justin Truong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-16 · SGV Tennis Addicts-James Lee-Arroyo HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irene Feher
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · SGV Tennis Addicts-James Lee-Arroyo HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Irene Feher
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-19 · SGV Tennis Addicts-James Lee-Arroyo HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacey Lam
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-18 · SGV Early Bird Specials-Mazin-Flint Cyn/SA12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rebecca Stokes
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · SGV Tennis Addicts-James Lee-Arroyo HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Theona Zhordania
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · SGV Early Bird Specials-Mazin-Flint Cyn/SA12 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amy Newhall
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-28 · SGV Tennis Addicts-James Lee-Arroyo HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Arthur Chmielewski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.6% of games
4.0
57%
53W–40L · 53.3% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.9% of games
3.0mixed
0%
0W–6L · 20.9% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
67 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal