← Search

Stacey Lam

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Gabriel, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 52W–8L · seasons 2024–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2024. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-10-24 · SGV Mo Better Tennis-DeRosa-WN/SA10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roseann DeRosa
loading the estimate
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-10-18 · SGV Mo Better Tennis-DeRosa-WN/SA10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carol Ecker
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-19 · SGV Tennis Addicts-James Lee-Arroyo HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kasia Chmielewski
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-05 · SGV LLW Mo Better Tennis-DeRosa-WN/SA10 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
Default
2026-06-28 · SGV LLW Mo Better Tennis-DeRosa-WN/SA10 · #1 Singles · 4.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-13 · SGV LLW Mo Better Tennis-DeRosa-WN/SA10 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-29 · SGV LLW Mo Better Tennis-DeRosa-WN/SA10 · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-05-29 · SGV LLW Mo Better Tennis-DeRosa-WN/SA10 · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-26 · SGV LLW Mo Better Tennis-DeRosa-WN/SU10 · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-17 · SGV LLW Mo Better Tennis-DeRosa-WN/SU10 · #2 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-03 · SGV LLW Mo Better Tennis-DeRosa-WN/SA10 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-29 · SGV LLW Mo Better Tennis-DeRosa-WN/SA10 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 58.8% of games
3.5
100%
6W–0L · 72.9% of games
4.0
100%
29W–0L · 80.8% of games
4.5
75%
3W–1L · 53.2% of games
3.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 60.3% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 53.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 40% of the time
#1 Singles
40%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
7 matches
#2 Singles
8%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
5 matches
Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert