← Search

Jean Kim

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Los Angeles, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
58 matches · 33W–25L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history58 matches
W
2026-10-25 · LA - Queen Anne 4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Brantley
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-24 · SGV Queens of the Court- Vuong-Arroyo Seco/SA4 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anita Tang
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-10-04 · SGV Queens of the Court- Vuong-Arroyo Seco/SA4 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Taylor
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
Default
2026-09-20 · LA - Queen Anne 4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eriana Blankinship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-09-13 · LA - Queen Anne 4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Meyerson
loading the estimate
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-12 · SGV Queens of the Court- Vuong-Arroyo Seco/SA4 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Taylor
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-15 · LA LLW Queen Anne 3.0-4.0W - Charlotte Gray · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Irene Feher
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-09 · LA LLW Queen Anne 3.0-4.0W - Charlotte Gray · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Brantley
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karina Vicente championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-14 · LA - Queen Anne 4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Brantley
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · LA - Queen Anne 4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eriana Blankinship
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · PekeSingles/Bennett/VNSO · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
71.4%
15W–6L · 58.2% of games
4.0
45.7%
16W–19L · 50.1% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#1 Singles
22%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
8 matches
#2 Singles
12%
7 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert