← Search

Michelle Brantley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Culver City, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 55W–68L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history123 matches
W
2026-10-25 · LA - Queen Anne 4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jean Kim
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-20 · LA - Queen Anne 4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madeleine Neuville
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-09-13 · LA LLW Queen Anne 3.0-4.0W - Charlotte Gray · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madeleine Neuville
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-29 · LA LLW Queen Anne 3.0-4.0W - Charlotte Gray · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katy Palfrey
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · LA LLW Queen Anne 3.0-4.0W - Charlotte Gray · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jean Kim
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-14 · LA - Queen Anne 4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jean Kim
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · LA - Queen Anne 4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Virginia Takeuchi
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · LA - Queen Anne 4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joselyn Martinez Bobadilla
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-09 · LA - Queen Anne 4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karina Vicente
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-04-24 · LA LLW Queen Anne 8.0 - Duc Le · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Duc Le mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · LA - Queen Anne 4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jean Kim
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-03-08 · LA - Queen Anne 4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rumduol Vuong
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
46.8%
44W–50L · 48.5% of games
4.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 41.6% of games
8.0
42.1%
8W–11L · 46.8% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
34 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova