← Search

Julie Le

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Westminster, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
218 matches · 86W–132L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history218 matches
W
2026-10-25 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Ikuta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-10-18 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin Ikuta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-10-10 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristine Kim
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-09-27 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristine Kim
loading the estimate
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-09-20 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristine Kim
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-09-13 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU10 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judd Tongprajiad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-23 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hatien Nguyen
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-22 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA8 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deann McCormick
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-16 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SA8 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hatien Nguyen
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · OC Los Cab - Julie · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Hung Vu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-09 · SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hatien Nguyen
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · OC Los Cab - Julie · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Frank Tran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
3.0
30%
3W–7L · 41.9% of games
3.5
67.7%
21W–10L · 54.2% of games
4.0
22.4%
17W–59L · 41.1% of games
4.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 32.1% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 32.7% of games
4.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 59.4% of games
8.0mixed
48.8%
20W–21L · 49.1% of games
8.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
36.8%
7W–12L · 42.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
92 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
37 matches
#1 Singles
15%
33 matches
#2 Singles
3%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert