← Search

Jordan Curiel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Los Angeles, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 34W–18L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history52 matches
W
Default
2026-11-01 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SU2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derek Moard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-11-01 · SGV Ball Hogs-R. Yip-Arroyo Seco/SU12 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Annemarie Schnedler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-25 · SGV Ball Hogs- R.Yip-Arroyo Seco/ SU2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly McMillen
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-10-18 · SGV Ball Hogs- R.Yip-Arroyo Seco/ SU2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrei Bujko
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-10-18 · Mojo/Shahriaree-Brag/Scholl · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dusty Summers
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-10-17 · SGV Ball Hogs-R. Yip-Arroyo Seco/SU12 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Marie Nguyen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-10-04 · SGV Ball Hogs- R.Yip-Arroyo Seco/ SU2 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryce Tsai
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-03 · Mojo/Shahriaree-Brag/Scholl · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richie Oshiro
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-09-27 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SU2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luis Martinez
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-26 · Mojo/Shahriaree-Brag/Scholl · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Lie
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-20 · SGV Ball Hogs-Yip-Arroyo/SU4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Lui
loading the estimate
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-09-20 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SU2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Derek Moard
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
67.6%
25W–12L · 57.6% of games
4.0
100%
5W–0L · 68.5% of games
2.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
5 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches
Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King