← Search

Derek Moard

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Pasadena, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 27W–47L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history74 matches
W
Default
2026-11-01 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SU2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Curiel
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-10-04 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SU2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Luis Martinez
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-20 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SU2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Curiel
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-09-13 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SU2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Lee
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-5
L
2026-08-08 · SGV Ball Hogs-Yip-Arroyo/SU4 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tam Vo
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-06 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SA2 · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SA2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Acosta
loading the estimate
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-02 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SA2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rafael Molina
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-25 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SA2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rafael Molina
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-18 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SA2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Neal St. Clair
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-11 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SA2 · #2 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-21 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SU2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Shiroishi
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games
3.5
37.8%
14W–23L · 46.2% of games
4.0
25.9%
7W–20L · 40.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 24% of the time
#3 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
15 matches
#2 Singles
20%
15 matches
#1 Singles
7%
5 matches
#3 Singles
5%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova