← Search

Rafael Molina

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Los Angeles, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
125 matches · 44W–81L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history125 matches
W
2026-10-18 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SU2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roger Perez
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-5
L
2026-10-17 · Knights at Court/Heum/El Cariso · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Matcham
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-10-04 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SU2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Lee
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-27 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SU2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tam Vo
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-23 · SGV Mixed Underdogs 55-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adrienne Beauvois mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-16 · SGV Mixed Underdogs 55-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Trish Newlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-26 · SGV Mixed Underdogs 55-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ennie Gonzaga mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-12 · SGV Underdogs 55-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ted Nuguid
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-28 · Knights at Court/Heum/El Cariso · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Byeon
loading the estimate
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-27 · SGV Underdogs 55-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adam Acosta
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-20 · Knights at Court/Heum/El Cariso · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Lubnow
loading the estimate
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-14 · SGV Winner Winner Chicken Dinner-Moard-Arroyo/SA2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tam Vo
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
30%
3W–7L · 43.9% of games
4.0
42.6%
23W–31L · 43.4% of games
7.0
20%
1W–4L · 38.5% of games
8.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 42.7% of games
3.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 41% of games
7.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 37.9% of games
8.0mixed
31.6%
6W–13L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
30 matches
Singles
6%
7 matches
#1 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova