← Search

CHIH HAO PAN

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Diamond Bar, CA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 44W–20L · seasons 2022–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history64 matches
W
2026-10-04 · SGV Underdogs Jables-Purwadi-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jih Ke Yeh
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-20 · SGV Underdogs Jables-Purwadi-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Prem Dhanendran
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-13 · SGV Underdogs Jables-Purwadi-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tony F Tian
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-12 · SGV Underdogs 55-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lam Bui
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-27 · SGV Underdogs 55-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lam Bui
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · SGV Underdogs Aces-Bui-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with GEVORG KASABIAN
loading the estimate
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-06 · SGV Underdogs 55-Nuguid-Diamond Bar HS/SU10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hans Stoehr
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · SGV LLW Underdogs Aces-Bui-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Cheng championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-29 · SGV LLW Underdogs Aces-Bui-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Cheng championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-21 · SGV LLW Underdogs Aces-Bui-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Vasquez
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-01 · SGV LLW Underdogs Aces-Bui-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Mesdjian
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-12-20 · SGV LLW Underdogs Aces-Bui-Diamond Bar HS/SU8 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Phan
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
100%
11W–0L · 64.6% of games
4.0
60.7%
17W–11L · 53.5% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 46% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams